Thursday, January 24, 2008

With Ledger dies the newest Gilliam film.


The more I learn about film, the more I realize how difficult it is directing films. Directors face pressure from producers, investors, critics, and fans throughout their entire careers. With deadlines set, directors often find themselves fighting weather, local political turmoil, and even their own actors. No one in Hollywood seems to have experienced these pressures more than director Terry Gilliam.

Gilliam made a name for himself working with the British comedy group “Monty Python”. As a director, Gilliam’s films have been plagued by production problems. Gilliam has spent most of his life fighting with studios over his films. Many of his projects were shut down early in production. Gilliam’s films have also been plagued by disaster. In 1999, Gilliam attempted to film “The Man Who Killed Don Quixote,” which had an original budget of $32.1 million, but in the first week of shooting, the actor playing Don Quixote (Jean Rochefort) suffered a herniated disc and a flood severely damaged the set. Despite setbacks such as these, Gilliam has still managed to bring us some incredible films, such as “Brazil,” “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas,” “12 Monkeys,” and “The Fisher King”.

Sadly, though, with the death of Heath Ledger, tragedy has struck Gilliam again. At the time of Ledger’s death, Gilliam and Ledger were about halfway through filming Gilliam’s newest film “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus”. Ledger’s death was a tragedy. Actors always seem a bit larger than life. Anytime an actor like Ledger dies, it reminds us that actors are, like us, just human beings and that the studio system can be as fragile as life itself.

Monday, January 7, 2008

Art imitating life


Years ago I watched a movie called “The Last Man on Earth”. This film, originally released in 1964, tells the story of Dr Robert Morgan, a scientist who is the the sole surviving human of an apocalyptic epidemic. In the film, those humans who did not die from the epidemic have mutated into vampire zombies. “The Last Man on Earth” closely follows the plot line of the 1954 novel by Richard Matheson called “I Am Legend”. Both the 1964 film and the original book end pessimistically with the human race dying.

Over Christmas break, joining most of America, I watched Will Smith’s new blockbuster action/thriller “I am Legend”. This film, a remake of the novel by the same name, took a much more optimistic approach. Without divulging too much detail, in the newest version of Matheson’s science fiction classic, the “last man on Earth” manages to save humanity.

I have yet to decide whether or not I liked the new ending, it does, though, beg an interesting question. I believe that art imitates life. If this is true, I can’t help but wonder if Americans are more optimistic than we were 40 years ago. Both the book and the original movie were made in the wake of World War II. WWII crushed the naive dream that the world was becoming a progressively better place. Mass genocide and the invention of nuclear weapons destroyed any hopes Americans perviously had about the inherent goodness of mankind.

What has happened since then that has regained America’s optimism in humanity? Perhaps Americans are just sick of pessimistic movies...

Sunday, November 25, 2007

A new idea for Hollywood.


Today I watched the movie “Hitman”. It was horrible. Really horrible. I don’t know what I expected. Has there ever been a good movie made based on a video game? I think I was tricked into watching it by the trailer. Trailers always make movies look more entertaining than they are. Marketing companies cut out the bad story line in action movies and just show you the five minutes of exciting scenes from the movie when they make trailers. Without the horrible plot and depressingly bad acting, movies like “Hitman” look really entertaining. Maybe what hollywood should do is make thirty hour long movies, give the movies to the marketing companies, have them cut out all the dialogue and plot, and leave us with two hours of non-stop action. Maybe that would be worth watching... a two hour long trailer.

Friday, November 23, 2007

Earth in HD


It’s Thanksgiving break and I’m currently housesitting. I should be working on one of about six papers I have due before the end of the semester, but instead I’m watching an incredible TV series called “Planet Earth”. The creators of this series have travelled around the world capturing images of our planet using high-definition photography and ultra-high speed cameras. It’s nothing short of spectacular. The cherry on top is that I’m watching the series on a large flat-screen HD TV.

I love housesitting for wealthy people.

Documentary or screen savor?


What’s the difference between a silent documentary and a screen savor? A few months ago I read the following about a documentary called “Into Great Silence”:

“INTO GREAT SILENCE fits neatly into the sub-category of films that need to be experienced rather than just watched. Over 162 minutes director Philip Groening films a group of monks who dwell in the Carthusian monastery of the Grande Chartreuse in the French Alps. The monks have taken a vow of silence, and live life at such a gentile pace that it took them 13 years to respond to Groening's request to make a film about them. The subjects of Groening's film fill their days with slow and highly repetitive routines, so the director shoots at a suitably slow pace, highlighting simple tasks such as praying, gardening, cooking, and doing laundry. Groening lived with the monks for four months and worked under strict conditions dictated to him by the order; no voiceover, music, or interviews were to be included in the film, and Groening was to be the sole crew member on the shoot.” - synopsis from Rotten Tomatoes.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/into_great_silence/about.php

I was curious as to how a documentary of this sort would have ever been made. Could you imagine Groening trying to pitch his idea to a producer for the first time?... “Check this out, I want to make a documentary about the most mundane group of people on this planet. These guys all dress the same, do the same thing every day, never leave their home and never speak. There will be no explosions, no fast cars, no impressive special effects, no catchy songs, and no girls.” Somehow, though, Groening was able to make his film. What’s more, he was able to make a beautiful film that was met with critical acclaim.

“Into Great Silence” is not an easy film to watch. It’s long and, as the title reveals, It’s almost completely devoid of sound. Watching the film takes patience and, for me, it took several sittings and more than a few cups of coffee. Watching the movie, though, was an incredibly rewarding experience. “Into Great Silence” is a movie about subtlety and reflection. Groening’s filming style invites his viewers to go beyond voyeurism; to participate in the monastic life.

“Into Great Silence” raised theological questions in my mind. Is there a place for monasticism in the Church? Are these monks fulfilling The Great Commission in which Christ commands his followers to “Go into the word and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation”? The answers to these questions may not be as clear in your mind after seeing the devotion these men men have to the life of prayer.

I wouldn’t recommend this film to you if you’re easily distracted or easily bored. But if you’re up to the task, it’s definitely worth your time.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Escapist America


CNN ran an article today with the headline “Vampires and fun top the box office this weekend.” The article points out that Americans are choosing to watch “escapist” films as opposed to movies that might have “serious” content.

“Audiences continued to choose merriment over misery as the latest crop of sober Academy Awards hopefuls, among them Ben Affleck's "Gone Baby Gone," Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal's "Rendition" and Halle Berry and Benicio Del Toro's "Things We Lost in the Fire," debuted with so-so to dismal numbers.

Whether it's the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, deadly news out of Pakistan and Myanmar or Friday's stock market tumble, moviegoers seem disinterested in more bad news at theaters with films about child-kidnapping, torture, widowhood and heroin addiction.”- CNN

Full story: http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Movies/10/21/boxoffice.ap/index.html

At first, reading this article made me angry. I would like to think that film is (for the most part) art, not mindless escapism. On the other hand, I admit that there are times, at the end of a long week, when I have wanting to sit in from of a screen and watch something that isn’t going to make me think or depress me.

I think escapist movies are a little like junk food - alright to consume sometimes, but not on a regular basis. We all saw “Super Size Me” right? I would like to see someone do a documentary on what would happen if a person watched nothing but mindless-blockbuster-action-flicks for a whole year. Would their brain starve? I wonder...

Watch more Bergman


Just in case you haven’t heard, Michelangelo Antonioni and Ingmar Bergman, two of the greatest filmmakers in history, died this summer on the same day (July 30, 2007). One of my favorite magazines, “Paste” recently ran an article on these two directors which pointed out that:

“...both men lived long a fruitful lives, so it’s hard not to enjoy the sudden interest in their work and the vigorous debates - unthinkable just a few months ago - among people people now eager to compare the opposing styles of these two giant filmmakers...”

I couldn’t agree more. I think that the best way to honor any great artist when he or she dies is to revisit the art that the artist left behind. When I discovered that Bergman (my favorite of the two) died, I spent the next several days watching his films (keep in mind I was on summer break). I had seen many of Bergman’s films in college. Films like “The Seventh Seal,” “Wild Strawberries,” “Persona,” and what has been called “The Spider-God Trilogy” have had a lasting impact on me. I re-watched these films and enjoyed them as much as I had the first time I saw them. I didn’t stop there, though. I scoured local video stores for any Bergman films I hadn’t seen. This summer was the first time I saw Bergman’s “The Virgin Spring,” “The Magic Flute,” “Fanny and Alexander,” and “Scenes from a Marriage.”

I came away from this experience being as convinced as I ever have been that Bergman’s films are some of the most important films for Christians to be watching. Bergman’s father was a clergymen, and many of Bergman’s films deal with questions concerning God and the Church. Furthermore, Bergman’s films have had a lasting influence on many of the directors we know today.

If you have never seen a Bergman film... now is that time.

Where to start? I would start where I started:
“The Seventh Seal,” and “Wild Strawberries.”

I would also recommend, especially if you are married, or are ever interested in getting married, watching “Scenes from a Marriage”.